World Economics - Insight , Analysis and Data
World Economics Journal
Crime & corruption
Economic indicators and forecasting
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Savings and debt
Exchange Rate Policy
Labour Market Reform
Law and Justice
Food and Agriculture
Media, Sport and Entertainment
Retail and Consumer Goods
World Economics Journal Archive
Browse the complete World Economics Journal archive.
World Economics Authors
Biographies and contact details for all authors.
Full list of executive editors and our advisory board
Submit an Article
Details and notes for authors regarding journal submissions.
Journal Subscription Information
Subscribe to the journal online.
About World Economics
History and information about the site.
Useful numbers and contact details.
Terms & Conditions
How Safe is SAFE’s Management of China’s Official Foreign Exchange Reserves?
Ng Kuan Khai
World Economics, June 2013
This paper examines whether the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) and its subsidiary SAFE Investment Company (SIC), the sole managers of China’s gargantuan official foreign exchange reserves (OFER) until 2007, have shifted their investment behaviour since the inception of China Investment Corporation (CIC). We find that external conditions such as overexposure to US dollar-denominated assets and declining value of the greenback, as well as internal conditions like the rise of CIC as a rival to manage China’s OFER, have prompted SAFE-SIC to depart somewhat from their pre-2007 conservative style of investing most of China’s OFER in low-yielding foreign government bonds, especially US Treasury bills. Since 2008, SAFE-SIC, in a seeming competition with CIC, have started to pursue higher-risk, higher-return investments. However, we observe that this bolder strategy of SAFE-SIC might not be sustainable for long, because: (a) it duplicates CIC’s explicit mission already set by the State Council to invest in higher-risk, higher-return assets; (b) it runs against SAFE’s core mission to preserve, rather than grow, China’s OFER; and (c) SAFE is tied down by other core responsibilities such as the regulation of China’s foreign exchange administration system, the stewardship towards full capital-account convertibility, and the gradual internationalisation of the renminbi (RMB). As such, engaging in higher-risk, higher-return investments would most likely remain a secondary priority within SAFE’s overall mandate.
Data on Singapore’s Sovereign Wealth Fund is Flawed
World Economics, September 2015
Deflation? What Deflation? Statistical Origins of Japan’s Declining Price Levels
World Economics, June 2015
Inflation Targeting in Developing Countries
World Economics, June 2015
Keep updated with:
Posts from Facebook
Tweets from Twitter
Groups on LinkedIn
Alerts from RSS feed
Copyright World Economics Ltd. 2017